AUGUSTA — Gov. Paul LePage will meet legislative leaders to discuss what action the state may take against the Alexander Group in the wake of allegations the Rhode Island consultant plagiarized its recent report on reforming Maine’s welfare system.
Peter Steele, the governor’s communications director, said Thursday that LePage would meet with the top Democratic lawmakers, House Speaker Mark Eves and Senate President Justin Alfond, though the meeting likely won’t take place until at least June 12.
In a letter sent Wednesday evening, Eves and Alfond requested to meet with the governor sooner, but LePage will be away on a trade mission to Iceland during the times suggested by the Democratic leaders. Top Republicans in the House and Senate also will be invited.
In the letter, Alfond and Eves took exception to LePage’s stance that legislative leaders have no role to play in deciding what happens to the Alexander Group, which in September was awarded a $925,000 no-bid contract to produce several reports regarding Maine’s anti-poverty programs.
LePage told the Democrats in a previous letter to “ stay out of the executive branch’s business.”
“We respectfully disagree that the state contracts issued with taxpayer funds are not the business of the legislative branch,” Alfond and Eves said. “As representatives of the people of Maine, we are all accountable to the citizens of Maine. How taxpayer dollars are spent is all of our business and should be public information.”
It’s been two weeks since the Bangor Daily News first revealed that sections of the Alexander Group’s recent report on Maine welfare reform contained entire passages seemingly lifted from others’ work. Further claims of plagiarism have been made since, but the consulting group’s leader, Gary Alexander, has maintained the problem is one of flawed attribution, not ethics.
LePage has suspended any further payments to the group and has said further action — up to terminating the contract — could be taken after a review of the document.
Democrats, who have long criticized Alexander as a political actor, not an objective analyst, have demanded the contract be canceled and the consultant be made to give back the more than $500,000 it’s already received from the state. However, concerns about a lack of performance guarantees in the contract have raised doubts about whether the state could recoup the money.
During a news conference Tuesday, LePage said that on first glance, he thought “the contract was poor quality,” but that he thought the ideas in the report were good. He did not address, however, whether they were original ideas.
“We’re working on it now. We had a big meeting yesterday. We had three evaluations done, so we know where all the problems are,” LePage said. He did not address what other actions may be taken, or what criteria he will use in deciding whether to cancel the contract.
The plagiarism scandal has even reached Washington, D.C., where Republican budget leaders on Monday rescinded an invitation for Alexander to speak to the House Budget Committee about the War on Poverty and efforts to reform federal aid.
Send questions/comments to the editors.
