Contrary to statements attributed to Evan Cyr, author of the proposed zoning change endorsed April 18 by the Auburn City Council and Planning Board ( “Auburn nears end to income standard in agricultural zone,” April 19), eliminating the so-called income standard would definitely result in more residential construction in the Agricultural and Resource Protection zone.
For 60 years building a barn or a farm house, for example, in the zone required that the farmer or forester landowner earn income from farming or forestry sufficient to prove engagement in those pursuits. Cyr’s proposal uncouples residential construction from permitted land uses. Anyone with a 10-acre lot can apply for a building permit.
Regardless of the intentions behind the proposal, more houses would be built. This would undoubtedly alter the current character of this land area designated by Auburn citizens of the 1960s as protected open space for agriculture, conservation and recreation.
As written, the proposal would lead to increased land valuation, increased demand for city services and increased property taxes for all residents.
Ralph Harder, Auburn
Send questions/comments to the editors.
